On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/31/2009 04:42 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> On 05/31/2009 04:32 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>>> um ... given your wording, can i assume that f11 is the first
>>> fedora where this package has been broken out? which would explain
>>> why this builds just fine under f10 for others?
>>
>> Correct.
>
> that appears to have fixed it. yee ha! buckets of thanks. i can
> now update the wiki page to cover f11.
You might want to tell upstream that static linking isn't the
recommended path.
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
and yet f11 contains the statically-linked "insmod.static"
executable, which is exactly what is being created at that step. so
what's the difference?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page:
http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================