Le Ven 29 janvier 2010 17:59, David Malcolm a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:45 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
[snip]
Looks like whatever generates this report is reordering items in the
changelog relative to the %changelog in the specfile, but in some
surprising ways; is this a known issue?
Normally the items in a %changelog are in order most-recent through
least-recent.
But in this report, see e.g. how 2.2-9 appears, then 2.2-10:
> audacious-2.2-10.fc13
> ---------------------
> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-9
> - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple
> (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
> - Fix tuple_copy().
>
> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-10
> - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
> dict wasn't copied at all).
This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style
* Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)fedoraproject.org>
- 2.2-10
- Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
dict wasn't copied at all).
- 2.2-9
- Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple
(the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
- Fix tuple_copy().
--
Nicolas Mailhot