On 5/30/05, Keith Sharp <kms(a)passback.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:38 -0700, Scott wrote:
>
>
>>Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>lør, 28.05.2005 kl. 03.29 skrev seth vidal:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:04 -0700, Teak Billard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Would Fedora Extras be the place to have Mono
>>>>>available then or another repository such as Dag?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>fedora extras is under the same legal restrictions as fedora core.
>>>>
>>>>-sv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hmm.. What about some "semi-official" repo like livna, but with
>>>mono-stuff (Mpackage?)
>>>
>>>Kyrre
>>>
>>>
>>I notice that the mono site has a yum repo for FC3, Is anything else required?
>>
>>
>You would need to get the SRPMs and rebuild them for FC4T3 (and FC4
>eventually). It would also make sense to go over the SPEC files and
>make sure they were meeting the requirements of the Extras project.
>Finally you should check there is nothing the SPECs/RPMs that would
>preclude them moving to Core should the legal/patents issues ever be
>cleared up.
>
>Keith.
>
>
>
I have used/rebuilt on rawhide
nrpms.net in the past, the only problem
I had was building on x86_64, has a yum.repo for just mono too,
Matthew Hall has i386/ppc for fc 2/3. You could look at his spec
files and start from there, or contact him for help/suggestions, small
chance he would want to start something like Mpackage or maybe help
maintain the packages. (not sure)
http://www.nrpms.net/
http://www.nrpms.net/Docs/Yum/
"If you just want access to mono packages, you need to perform the
following command (as the root user):
rpm -ivh
http://repo.nrpms.net/nrpms-mono-release/1/RPMS/nrpms-mono-release-1-1.1....
"
For what its worth, Livna already has spec-files for Mono and Gtk-Sharp:
Mono -
Although the gtk-sharp.spec file seems to be unaccesible at the moment.
/Jacob