On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:10:14 -0500 (EST), Paul wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> Subject: Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2010-02-27
>>>
>>> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>>>
>>> ======================================================================
>>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>>> ======================================================================
>>>
>>> package: autotrust-0.3.1-2.fc12.i686 from fedora-12-i386
>>> unresolved deps:
>>> libunbound.so.1
>>
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autotrust-0.3.1-3.fc12
>>
>> I fired of a rebuild. Did I need to request an ABI change as well?
>
> Of course!
Just to clarify, autotrust had no abi change, just unbound. Which I did
request an abi change for a while ago?
Why do you ask me? With "request an ABI change" I thought you refer
to requesting a koji buildroot override tag. Is that assumption correct?
>> I requested update to testing, not stable. Not sure if that
is the
>> right thing for a simple rebuild.
>
> It is not the right thing. You ought to have noticed that
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unbound-1.4.1-2.fc12
> is ABI-incompatible because of a SONAME change.
> And you cannot rebuild anything against that new library as long
> as it is not a stable update that would be included in the koji
> buildroot installations.
Isn't this a catch22? autotrust will break as soon as unbound gets into
stable, while unbound is now waiting because it would break autotrust?
The proper way is to file a ticket in Fedora Release Engineering's tracker
and request a koji buildroot override tag for the new "unbound", then
rebuild autotrust and release both in the same bodhi ticket at once.