seth vidal schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:52 +0100, shrek-m(a)gmx.de wrote:
> but i can not follow the downgrade logic. is EPOCH the mystery?
> 8.0.2-1.fc8 < 1:0.17.7-3.fc8
> is 0:8.0 < 1:0.17 ?
>
yes.
a package w/o an epoch or with a zero epoch is less than a package with
an epoch of a greater value.
the above is exactly what epochs are for.
thanks rahul and seth for the explanation.
--
shrek-m