On 3 October 2013 12:23, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski <gene(a)czarc.net> wrote:
> Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named:
> Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso
> rather than:
> Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
>
> I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1"
> rather than just "Beta"
>
> Yes, I know, a nit.
>
>
>
> Not a nit, a misunderstanding. All Test Candidates are prominently
> named TCn with the version number as 1. Only at the Release candidate
> stage does the extra letters go away.
No, his point is that that's how it *should* be, but for TC1, doesn't
appear to be the case - the DVD and netinst images are named as if they
were RCs.
My apologies to everyone. I have clearly failed 4th grade English
comprehension.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.