On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:31 PM, mike cloaked <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Bill Nottingham
<notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram (metherid(a)gmail.com) said:
>> > But it doesn't make any sense. gnome-panel does *not* require
>> > gnome-shell. We really shouldn't just go around abusing dependencies to
>> > make upgrades 'work', even if it is convenient.
>>
>> I think users upgrading from a previous release can continue to get the
>> fallback mode unless they do a group installation or try to install
>> GNOME Shell specifically.
>
> How so? When we included KDE 4, we didn't leave users on KDE 3 on
> upgrade.
>
> Similarly, when a user has GNOME installed (and yes, the gnome-panel
> is GNOME), and they upgrade, they'll get the current version of GNOME.
> And that's GNOME Shell.
Unless of course they have no gnome-shell-capable hardware which may
not be insignificant numbers!
In that case gnome-session will detect that and start the fallback
(still no valid case against it being installed).