On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:57 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 09:56 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:33 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >> Dne 15.9.2011 21:38, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
> >>>> If someone wants to send me a list, I'd be happy to do the
comps edit.
> >>>> (I would assume ati, evdev, fbdev, intel, nouveau, synaptics,
vesa.)
> >>>
> >>> That list sounds just fine to me.
> >>
> >> qxl?
> >
> > Meh. If we're using critpath as a proxy for "this will affect the
vast
> > majority of users" then I don't think qxl qualifies yet.
>
> Except that qxl is starting to be the preferred graphics device for
> virtualization, and libvirt/qemu would like to have qxl working out of
> the box for creating new F16 VMs running on an F16 host.
Yeah. I'd want it on the list for that reason. It affects the default
F16 virt config.
I repeat, "meh". I wouldn't but I also wouldn't argue against it.
- ajax