On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Milan Kerslager wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:10:56PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:22:26 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> > > As a side-note, RPM cannot know that program X from package Y is
> > > executed in script A from package B. Hence in some cases, explicitly
> > > listed requirements are likely to stay.
> >
> > ? This argument I don't understand. This is what the requirements are
> > used for, but it doesn't matter whether files or packages are mentioned
> > as requirements. ALso not sure if you mean package or file names with
> > "explicitly listed arguments".
>
> It is one of the reasons why you see a mixture of automatically
> generated dependencies and manually added requirements.
With rpmdb-redhat package in your system you will see the names of
packages instead of names of required libraries. [...]
Using --redhatrequires and --redhatprovides, of course; it's not
automatic. (Which may or may not be causing some confusion here..)
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings