On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:41:28 +0200
Jan Kurik <jkurik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks for your long feedback Adam :-) I will try to answer your
question and I will hope I do not miss anything.
* Release blocking vs. Release non-blocking
This has been discussed on the meeting [1] whether we should have only
list of blocking deliverables as that is what we need now. However
from the long-term point of view we would like to have list of
non-blockig deliverables as well, to make sure we know what we are
delivering. The current page [2] is a mix of both and I agree it is
not consistent. Let consider this as the starting point with more work
to be done here.
IMHO, it should be "Release deliverables" and clearly mark blocking vs
non blocking. We need the non blocking ones as well so we know if
something is just missing or there's some issue with it, etc.
* Atomic & Docker
Check the FESCo meeting minutes [1] starting at 18:06:21 - "the cloud
people said no atomic"; "not a release blocker"
But it should still be listed there as non blocking
* Cloud AMI
I am not sure whether this is blocking or not. Hopefully Cloud WG can
provide us with a definitive answer [3].
Yeah, me either... but should be listed either way, IMHO.
kevin