On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 17:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> The latest official upstream release has a major of 0. Probably
> fedora.us has a development version.
In apt's case there are good reasons for using the svn-head
version,
biggest reason perhaps being proper SELinux support. Sure, you could
take just that patch and apply to cnc6 .. but I just happen to know svn-
head is stable and has bunch of other nice stuff besides just selinux-
support. :)
Too bad Gustavo hasn't gotten around to releasing cnc7 :( I've been
thinking of making an unofficial release out of the current tree but
probably that would just confuse matters even more. :-/
The fact that the svn server is down doesn't make it easier :(
I launched a request for a final release at apt-rpm.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net