On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
> Fedora will not become widely popular if it remains dangerous to install.
At least it doesn't seem more dangerous than any other distribution, but I agree
being trustworthy in this area makes it more likely people will install it.
+1
> Windows
> =======
>
(...)
> I propose the language be amended to the following:
>
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can
> boot into both Windows and Fedora."
> OS X
> ====
>
(...)
> "The installer must be able to install into free space
alongside an
> existing clean OS X installation and install a bootloader which can boot
> into both OS X and Fedora, OR the installer must prominently warn the
> user that he may be unable to boot OS X after installation, allowing the
> user to cancel installation and reboot to OS X."
All fine, except that we should maybe feel more than a little
concerned about release criteria wordered with *must* and not
*should*, when the dependency is a (rather large) piece of proprietary
software we have no control of and possibly no access to.
François