On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:43:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't know how broadly "QA context" goes here.
If "handling of all bugs
> and their lifecycle" is QA, then probably yes. But I don't have anything
new
> or surprising over what I've already said on the devel list. I'm just happy
> to talk about it whenever/wherever. As long as I am awake. :)
I don't think that would be a QA meeting topic exactly, no - the EOL
process isn't 'owned' by QA. As it affects multiple groups, major
changes to EOL probably need to go through FESCo or some kind of ad-hoc
meeting of 'involved' parties (at least QA and devel).
Okay, so, I'm asking the bugzilla people if CLOSED:EOL is even a reasonable
possibility. And then let's take it back to
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1198
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>