On 04/27/2011 05:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>>> Fedora, as a volunteeer effort, cannot.
>>> It's worse. I fear Fedora will loose contributors, because Fedora is not
>>> shipping the DE these users want.
>> We ship every major currently maintained desktop. Which one do you think
>> is missing?
> Adam, please.
>
> All of this thread is about "Gnome 3 not being a replacement for what
> used to be Gnome 2",
Is any other desktop more of a GNOME 2 replacement than GNOME 3? i.e.,
would changing to another default desktop result in more continuity? I
would say not.
Agreed. Things have derailed. Now the cart is stuck in the mud
In other words Gnome and Fedora (Both projects dominated by a single
enterprise) haved decided to switch their target audience.
Ralf