On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 10:25 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014, 4:14:50 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I can't either, and even if I did, I don't think it would justify
> the result number explosion. Storage is storage, arch is usually completely
irrelevant.
> When we're at it, why do we have both i686 and x86_64 at "Device
> tests"? A single results column for x86 should be enough. Same reasoning.
In the past, some filesystems have had issues handling 64-bit inodes
in 32-bit architectures. User data is too important to make an
assumption that these no longer will occur.
Device tests are not filesystem tests, though.
Could you provide some references to these issues?
With either set of tests, though, I don't see that any 'user data' is
involved: in each case the only partitions we're creating or touching
are new ones with no user data involved. Even if one of the filesystems
we create might suffer from a bug further down the line, I don't think
any of these tests would catch it, would they?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net