Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
decision. So, let the flame war begin. Do you want serial interface in
beta criterion? I asked anaconda team for suggestion and here is their
answer [2]. What is your opinion?
[1]
http://goo.gl/921Vo
[2]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-February/msg0014...
On Po, 2012-02-13 at 14:11 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
Because nobody had any objections, I've added new criterion to
[1] and
I've changed release level of [2] to final.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 09:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:39 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new final criterion:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> > supported interfaces"
> >
> > Serial port is covered by this one. As I've seen some discussion on
> > anaconda-devel list, it's still supported.
> >
> > I'm still waiting for anaconda opinion of cmdline interface [1]. They
> > should say what they want to support. This criterion ensures that all
> > supported interfaces will work in final release.
> >
> > There is another question. Do we still need text interface?? There is an
> > alpha criterion "The installer must be able to complete an installation
> > using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces", so it should
> > work.
>
> +1, looks good. I don't think there's any intent to drop the text
> installer, anaconda team has already discussed how to implement a text
> installer with the UI re-design, so it looks like it's sticking around.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
>
http://www.happyassassin.net
>