On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> No, it's ++ in programmer syntax, i.e., the next increment.
The fact
> that Cambridge in the name does not necessarily denote its similarity
> to the Cambridge codebase. :)
Should be ++Cambridge of course otherwise it evaluates to Cambridge and
we get two Cambridges and then +1 8)
Hmmm maybe
eval(Cambridge+1)
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen(a)lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 5-8058
Ta-03 SM-261 MailStop P208 DP 17U Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --