On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 13:12 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:10:15PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.1
It appears that a new format of "Rawhide Report Rawhide" is
on a rather important information about broken dependencies. That means
that if they appear, and they do show up with regularity, the choices
are either to wait quietly and hope that such breakage will be noticed
and fixed, eventually, or file a bugzilla report (maybe after some delay
- but how long?). Any sage suggestions? The best would be to have
a broken dependencies info back.
We are working on it. There is a *lot* of stuff that needs doing for
the Pungi 4 switchover. Dennis is aware of the missing depcheck
information and working on getting it back.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net