On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 22:01 -0400, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 21:00, seth vidal wrote:
[snip]
> This is bizarre. I can't duplicate this behavior at all. I'm going to
> try with intentionally corrupted rpms and see if I can get it to happen.
But isn't the fetching of headers done even before the rpms themselves
are even looked at? If so, corrupt rpms aren't likely to reproduce the
problem.
no the headers are gotten by byte ranges FROM the rpm now.
not in independent files.
-sv