On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:48 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Adam Williamson
<awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> "Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1" <-- the official name is Branched, you can
> just say 'Fedora Branched', and link to the Branched page -
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched . You can put a little
> explanation of what Branched is in brackets if you feel it necessary, I
> guess.
>
Fixed in the wiki page.
Actually, now I think about it, the group is intended to be used for
stable releases too. Should we write it as if that's already in place?
Something like:
"The Proven Testers are a dedicated group of the Fedora Quality
Assurance Community who work towards making sure updated Critical Path
packages for stable Fedora releases and the upcoming stable release
('Branched') are not broken"?
> The line "The QA group within FAS will grant the ability
to add karma
> inside of Bodhi to the Critical Path packages within Fedora
> CURRENT_RELEASE+1." seems out of place - is it an orphan?
That verbage was a little off and has been clarified (at least in my
mind, but verification from others is welcome!)
I think it should say 'ProvenTesters group', not 'QA group'. The point
of the proventesters project is to fulfill this role (of giving
'weighted' feedback); the way Bodhi currently uses the QA and releng
groups to do this is just a short-term bodge. When we put ProvenTesters
in place, it will be members of that group whose feedback is weighted,
not QA/releng members.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net