søn, 03.04.2005 kl. 07.28 skrev dragoran:
Paul wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>>this is a question I receive froom some Fedora Core 3 users. After
>>they have tried Ubuntu, they complained about the 'slow speed' of
>>Fedora. Their major complain are the number of seriveces enabled by
>>default event though they choose to do desktop installation. Another
>>complain I heard are the memory on which they use Ubuntu (once again)
>>to be efficient. How should I respend on that kind of question?
>>
>>
>
>It is possible by using parallel loading (there is a thing on the IBM
>website, but it's not for the easily scared!).
>
>The thing you've got to remember with Ubuntu is that it really is a
>minimal running Linux - if you stripped down the number of services FC
>starts on power up to the same as Ubuntu, you'd find the boot up is
>faster (not having to boot from CD).
>
>Currently, I've not got that many services running on either my laptop
>or this PC and it's on the desktop ready for me to use in just shy of 90
>seconds - which is much faster than Ubuntu!
>
>TTFN
>
>Paul
>
>
Parallel loading doen't help much. This have already been discussed in
the devel-list.
Yes there was a lot of talk about getting down boot time - but what did
come of it? It isn't listed as major goals for fc4 anymore - so will fc4
boot faster than fc3 did, or did this effort run out in the sand?
Kyrre