> > There is one important drawback, and that is the necessity
to be
> > subscribed to the list.
>
> I think this is an interesting idea, but aside from the drawbacks
> someone else noted (blocker voting is not QA-only), I see another:
> our
> current mailing list archive kinda sucks and is a pain to read a
> long
> thread on. If we get the shiny new one Mo is designing this might
> become
> a moot point, but right now I'd rather read even a messy bugzilla
> report
> than a long ML thread via our mail archives.
As I found out today, this mailing list allowed non-subscribed people
to post (and it broke today).
Scratch that, it didn't. It's a thing to consider, but it would involve quite a
lot of burden on list owner side.