On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:48:47 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/24/2012 03:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> criterion" - not done yet
> * "tflink to ask other interested parties (anaconda team,
> fesco...) to look over the beta criteria and see if
> there's anything they feel should be dialled down" - not done yet
Since you guys seem to be not confident enough in our own criteria
writing perhaps we should just stop writing them and have FESCO
writing those for us?
I think there is a difference between confidence and realizing that
we (and by we, I mean Fedora QA) are not omniscient - we can't
possibly know everything about what's reasonable and what makes up
a set of acceptably comprehensive criteria to describe an acceptable
release.
There is wisdom in getting input from other groups - QA is a part of
Fedora as a whole, not some completely isolated group which dictates
the definition of a quality release. There is also wisdom in not setting
the bar too high - that's a great path to irrelevance and having the
criteria ignored.
Tim