On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:31 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
Dne St 2. května 2012 23:53:36, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> GIMP is a professional image editing suite, just like
> Photoshop. It's not a basic touch-up tool. It doesn't really
> make sense to criticise it on the basis that you want to use
> it for something it's not really designed to do.
and which tool are we supposed to use?
Even if the answer were 'there isn't one', that's not GIMP's fault.
The
GIMP authors want to write a professional photo editor. If no-one wants
to write a simple touch-up tool, that's hardly the GIMP authors' fault,
is it?
so far, Shotwell and Digikam were proposed
but these aren't "basic touch-up tools" either:
Shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop
digiKam - A digital camera accessing & photo management
application
And we all know summary lines are always kept carefully up to date and
fully accurate and contain a complete description of all the app's
functionality in their 80 characters or less! (email really needs
a :rolleyes: emoticon).
It's really not difficult to actually _run_ either app and have a look
at what it can do. Shotwell has some pretty basic editing tools - more
'enhancement' than editing - but Digikam has some pretty advanced
functionality these days. See
http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/image-edito... , for a
quick indication of what it can do.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net