On 03/31/2011 06:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400,
Scott Robbins<scottro(a)nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it
> avoided relabling. (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm
> or correct that statement.)
Yes, enforcing=0 is a better temporary workaround than selinux=0 because
the latter will force a relabel.
I think this plays no role for me because *I* have SELINUX=disabled in
/etc/selinux/config.
--
Joachim Backes <joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes