On 12/20/23 09:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/19/23 14:19, Ian Laurie wrote:
> On 12/20/23 08:44, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie <nixuser(a)mail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I notice that:
>>>
>>> sudo dnf group upgrade --with-optional Multimedia
>>>
>>> produces the error:
>>>
>>> No match for group package "gimp-heif-plugin"
>>>
>>> Seems like "gimp-heif-plugin" no longer exists in the repos. Is
this a
>>> bug in the spec file for the Multimedia group?
>>>
>>
>> This is not defined in Fedora's multimedia comps group. It's probably
>> coming from some other repository's comps definition.
>
> Well if it's not a Fedora group, it would have to be RPM Fusion.
And that's where it is:
<group>
<id>multimedia</id>
<name>Multimedia</name>
<description>Audio/video framework common to desktops</description>
<default>false</default>
<uservisible>false</uservisible>
<packagelist>
<packagereq>gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld</packagereq>
<packagereq>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</packagereq>
<packagereq>ffmpeg</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="chromium">ffmpeg-libs</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="firefox">ffmpeg-libs</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="gimp">gimp-heif-plugin</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="libavcodec-free">libavcodec-freeworld</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="libheif">libheif-freeworld</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="pipewire">pipewire-codec-aptx</packagereq>
<packagereq type="conditional"
requires="qt5-qtwebengine">qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld</packagereq>
</packagelist>
</group>
But that's not a Fedora issue. File a bug with rpmfusion.
Thanks, I'll do that, but apologies for the stupid question, but what
package can I file the bug against? Multimedia is a group not a package
right? Or would a post on their devs list be ok?
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney