On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 13:23 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:44:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm rather confused by the thread you're replying to, though. I don't
> see how any of it makes an awful lot of sense. If the case is starting
> from a single installed kernel, how is increasing the
> 'installonly_limit' going to change anything? And if dnf didn't want to
> remove the kernel that the user was at the time of running (I assume)
> `dnf system-upgrade download` using successfully, how exactly would
> letting it remove an older(?) kernel have 'led to disaster'? Did you
> remove some important earlier context?
Full thread for context:
https://da.gd/Idg3
Oooh. PAE. You shoulda said.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333591
It got closed, but I don't think the fix was sent to anything before
Rawhide.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net