On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:26:57PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> My next question would be why is including a second older
compiler
> necessary? I could understand it for the transition to 2.96, and then
> to 3.2, but why is it necessary from 3.2.* to 3.3?
Gcc 3.3 has an improved parser which rejects some borderline bogus
constructs that gcc 3.2 permitted. The kernel like several other projects
found it had a few of them. [...]
Does that mean that the kernel for severn has to be build with gcc
3.2.x? I.e. could I develop and build binary kernel modules for
severn's kernel from RH9 tools?
--
Axel.Thimm(a)physik.fu-berlin.de