On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 08/20/2013 10:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
>>> Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
>>> changes are pretty simple.
>> As discussed at the QA meeting this morning, I've gone ahead and pushed
>> all the proposed changes so far into 'production'. I'll try and
draft up
>> the remaining change for visible cloud ASAP. thanks folks!
> I might have missed something, but is XFCE really non-blocking for ARM? I remember
someone saying that XFCE is the most important desktop for them. (and also that GNOME
doesn't work almost anywhere).
From my pov we ( as in the QA community ) really should not be release
blocking on desktop environments.
However the desktop environments sub-communities might decide for
themselves which arch they support and if they are release blocking for
them and test accordingly.
I assume we will adopt our release blocking criteria in accordance with
whatever comes out of this ring proposal ( Although I still not seeing
how that proposal actually solves anything for us ), specifically
workstation and which DE it will ship ( which probably will be either
Gnome or KDE ) and drop the requirement for the other one in the process.
My take was just to wait and see what really happens for now.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net