On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:58 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:14:39PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:32 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> > Is all the above just unfinished yet a version transition or some
> > kind of an elaborate joke? If this is a joke then I do not get it.
>
> Moving Applications -> Desktop Preferences to Desktop -> Preferences is
> intentional and the result of much upstream discussion.
This is not a big issue per se. What I strongly dislike though is
that "custom menu" is getting longer and longer. Think about
somebody with a poorer sight who really needs much bigger letters,
and add on the top of it a translation to some language where
descriptions tend to be more verbose, although "Applications" is not
a four letter word either, and you ate much of a panel. Multiple
panels are not a universal option. I would like to have at least a
possibility to replace these "headers" with some, even abstract,
icons. Tools to customize menus, at last, would be nice too.
That's a discussion for upstream where it has already been agonized
over.
OTOH this "MTA Switcher" on a menu left me scratching my
head. How
often do you perform such operation? Every second day, once a week,
once a year or once in a blue moon after careful consideration of
pros and cons? And the fact that it even works for a non-root and
without any password got me floored. Somebody may even use it in a
full innocence not realizing what s/he is doing. How this may
happen?
Dude, its rawhide, its buggy, it wasn't a design decision. Log bugs :-)
(Or preferably see if you can figure out how to fix it in redhat-menus
and submit a patch)
Mark.