On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 10:36 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> So, why is kdemultimedia i386 installed?
This just gets better...
[root@spirit ~]# rpm -e kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.i386
So far so good. No complaints from rpm and the disk drive made noise. Now, I
wonder if it left the 64 bit apps alone?
[root@spirit ~]# rpm -qV kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.x86_64
.......T /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/kde-multimedia-music.menu
.......T /usr/share/apps/noatun/magictable
missing /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/apis.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/arts-structure.png
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/artsbuilder.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/common
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/detail.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/digitalaudio.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/faq.docbook
Nope. It ate the files from both packages. I don't think this is working quite
right. It seems that it had the smarts to overcome file conflicts when
installing the packages.
This is in bugzilla and I'm chasing it down - we're not choosing to skip
removal of overlapping doc files.
Paul