On Monday, March 17, 2014, 4:14:50 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I can't either, and even if I did, I don't think it would
justify
the result number explosion. Storage is storage, arch is usually completely irrelevant.
When we're at it, why do we have both i686 and x86_64 at
"Device
tests"? A single results column for x86 should be enough. Same reasoning.
In the past, some filesystems have had issues handling 64-bit inodes
in 32-bit architectures. User data is too important to make an
assumption that these no longer will occur.