On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
<caf(a)omen.com> wrote:
> According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable.
> Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er).
RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is carrying a
ton of patches.
I expect this is going to cause a lot of confusion.
I don't see why. Backporting security fixes is standard procedure and
has been for decades. It would be extremely irresponsible to just shove
out a new and untested openssl build as a stable update.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net