On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 01:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Nevertheless it seems to be easy to workaround, for example by using
the
whiteboard as an additional way to propose blocker/NTH bugs. It should
even be possible to write an additional service that scans for bugs with
the respective whiteboard field and adding the bug to the respective
tracker bug.
The problem with the whiteboard field is it's too vulnerable to error:
you can typo easily, and anyone putting anything else there can
intentionally or inadvertently overwrite what anyone else has put in it.
It's such a fragile field I'm never happy relying on it...even using it
for accepted/rejected status as we do now was meant to be a stopgap.
Adjusting the process for nominating blockers is a legitimate way out of
the problem, of course, but I don't think using the whiteboard field is
a good alternative. Any other ideas? :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net