On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:22 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 03/24/2012 03:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The big difference is that ARM doesn't currently use, or plan to use,
> anaconda for deployment. They work by building images specific to
> particular target devices, which you just dump onto the device and then
> boot.
Which only means that the relevant reporters do not have to perform the
install test matrix.
Either the image works for them or it doesn't
( it kinda goes without saying that if it doesn't they should file a
report )...
I was thinking in terms of just having a mini-matrix for ARM, pretty
much as you describe: it'd just have a column for every supported box
and have a 'Does it boot?' result row, pretty much.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net