On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, shrek-m(a)gmx.de wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>it's clear that if
>someone finds a serious bug in samba during testing, it should be patched
>if possible so the people who *are* testing it can continue.
>
>this sort of update is clearly different from, say, upgrading from KDE
>3.1.5 to 3.2, for example, which would be proposed just for getting new
>features. are you seriously suggesting that you don't recognize the
>fundamental difference between upgrading because you want a new package
>with newer features, and upgrading to fix a significant bug?
>
>
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
KDE 3.2
23 January test1 devel freeze
sorry, i just wanted to come up with a hypothetical example and KDE
leaped to mind.
rday