On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsmuir(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:47:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> What does everyone think? Thanks!
> Device tests:
> -PATA? They aren't made anymore, do we really need to distinguish
> between SATA and PATA? Is there a case where it worked on one but
> not the other? I'd think we'd sooner want SATA vs SAS, at least they use a
different driver.
On ARM the majority will be MMC, with some SATA that may involve USB.
On PPC (secondary arch) SCSI is still quite important.
Right so does it make sense to have these as separate categories:
SATA/PATA
SCSI/SAS
MMC/SDCard
USB
PCIe SSD (which may morph into NVMe)
?
I guess I'm not seeing the point of separate PATA/SATA device tests is my main point,
and second is that there are other devices not in the list that maybe ought to be in the
list.
Chris Murphy