On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Per Bothner <per(a)bothner.com> wrote:
On 11/17/2016 12:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Per Bothner <per(a)bothner.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/2016 09:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Per Bothner <per(a)bothner.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, the install (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso) went
>>>> very smoothly. The "media test" failed, but booting into safe
mode and
>>>> installing to hard disk was otherwise smooth.
>>> How did you create the media? There are several ways the media test
>>> can be thwarted depending on how it's created; either dd or
>>> mediawriter methods should result in valid media or it's probably a
>>> bug somewhere - my first guess is bad flash.
>>
>>
>> Two different flash drives two different iso's:
>> I first tried Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25_Beta-1.1.iso on one flash
>> drive,
>> and a different flash drive, then I tried
>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso
>> in the first drive. Same result for all of them.
>
>
> OK you didn't answer the question. Those are file names. How did you
> put the files onto the flash drives?
Sorry - I meant to say I used Fedora Media Writer (on F24).
Hmm that's been tested quite a bit the last two cycles. I'd sooner
expect two USB flash drives have bad cells resulting in corruption on
reads than a write corruption bug in mediawriter itself.
--
Chris Murphy