----- Original Message -----
We need to pay special attention to the half implementation of the
preset feature [1] that Red Hat club that FESCO is, decided should
take
place.
Red Hat Club? Mitr, the Red Hatter voted -1 because of "<mitr> kay: right,
and my election platform said "time-definite migrations". So I'm forced
to be -1" ;-)
The feature it self is much needed and appreciated however not
making
the switch in a single release cycle after all the legacy sysv script
have been migrated native systemd units will leave us in a pile of
shit
to deal with where *some*'packages ( and spins ) will use preset and
others not.
It's still possible to implement it within single release cycle. Just
there has to be community buy in. And at least spins with DMs would
have to step into.
R.
We need to pay special attention to those packages ( and spins )
that
will get the preset treatment with regards to potential upgrade
problems
( enable/disable of service etc ) and other fallout that might occur.
Arguably we ( QA ) should take a firm stance against this being
implement into the distribution like this since this change will span
over several release cycles.
Regards
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets
--
test mailing list
test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test