On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:32:23AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
Er... IIRC "Cambridge++" is a placeholder until Red Hat
figures out what
the "entirely different code word" is going to be. (I think this was
explained on the
rhl.redhat.com web page that got taken down.)
You are correct, that's how we're using it. Just "whatever we
call what follows cambridge".
michaelkjohnson
"He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
Linux Application Development -- Ben Franklin
http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad/