On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:00 AM Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:04 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> > This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update.
> > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
> > We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship
> > with Toolbx. As a result, we filed a releng ticket[1] where
> > we justified the following: We need the image ready for branch point,
> > beta and final and that image be blocked implying we resort to
"no-go"
> > if the expected image is not there at all.
> >
> > As the basic functionality of toolbx continues to work as intended, we
> > would also like to block on any upcoming changeset, if that
> > has the potential to break toolbx or toolbx OCI image deliverables as
> > well. Read [2] for more exact things that might break toolbx.
> >
> > Finally, GNOME WS, Silverblue, FCOS include Toolbx as part of their
> > deliverable. RHEL does the same. It's crucial that we block
> > on this. However, as the changeset process rolls, we will go through
> > FESCO as well. This is just a good time for us to ensure
> > we all are on the same page and have the plumbing done beforehand!
> >
>
> I'd also like to preload toolbx on Fedora KDE:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/346
>
> We already ship it for Fedora Kinoite.
yaaaayyyy!!!!
Note that my desire to preload it depends on a guarantee
that it isn't broken and works on GA.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!