=====================================
#fedora-qa: f18final-blocker-review-1
=====================================
We ended up not having enough people to get very far today but I'll
be scheduling another review meeting for tomorrow.
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-28/f18final-blocker-re...
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-28/f18final-blocker-re...
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-28/f18final-blocker-re...
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (tflink, 16:59:58)
* Introduction (tflink, 17:17:15)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (tflink, 17:17:21)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 17:17:28)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 17:17:28)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 17:17:33)
* LINK:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink,
17:17:34)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink,
17:17:38)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:17:39)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:17:39)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:17:39)
* Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 17:18:08)
* 48 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 17:18:11)
* 2 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 17:18:11)
* 23 Proposed NTH (tflink, 17:18:11)
* 0 Accepted NTH (tflink, 17:18:11)
* (878956) After installation is complete, Alt+F4 is broken (tflink,
17:18:34)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878956 (tflink,
17:18:34)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:18:34)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859485 (adamw,
17:23:52)
* AGREED: 878956 - RejectedBlocker, AcceptedNTH - This doesn't clearly
hit any of the F18 final release criteria but is not good for the
user experience and can't be fixed with an update on the livecds
(tflink, 17:32:11)
* (830434) Omits "IPV6INIT=yes" from kickstart-generated ifcfg-* file
(tflink, 17:32:16)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830434 (tflink,
17:32:16)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:32:16)
* AGREED: 830434 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F18 beta
release criterion for IPv6 systems: " The installer must be able to
successfully complete a scripted installation, using the installer's
preferred scripting system, which duplicates the default interactive
installation as closely as possible" (tflink, 17:47:18)
* (852808) Omits "IPV6INIT=yes" from the generated ifcfg-* file
(tflink, 17:47:33)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852808 (tflink,
17:47:33)
* Proposed Blocker, dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 17:47:33)
* AGREED: 852808 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F18 alpha
release criterion for IPv6 networks - "The installed system must be
able to download and install updates with yum and the default
graphical package manager in all release-blocking desktops"
(tflink, 17:50:40)
* (861123) Please add x-systemd.device-timeout=0 to mount options for
encrypted file systems that need a passphrase from the user (tflink,
17:50:48)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861123 (tflink,
17:50:52)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:52:20)
* AGREED: 861123 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't clearly hit any of
the F18 final release criteria as it still has a reasonable timeout
and could be fixed with an update. (tflink, 17:57:29)
* (876716) anaconda crashes after setting root password (tflink,
17:57:35)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876716 (tflink,
17:57:36)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:57:36)
* ACTION: adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@ (adamw,
18:05:31)
* ACTION: adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@ (adamw,
18:05:55)
* AGREED: 876716 - While this is nasty, we need more information on
how common the issue is. Ask test@ if anyone else has been seeing
this and re-visit at the next meeting (tflink, 18:07:07)
* Open Floor (tflink, 18:10:22)
* we don't have enough people to continue the blocker review today
(tflink, 18:10:34)
* we will attempt to continue tomorrow, in the hope that we will have
enough people to make progress (tflink, 18:11:00)
Meeting ended at 18:16:26 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@
* adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
* adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@
* adamw to ask for reproducers of 876716 on test@
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (112)
* adamw (53)
* jreznik (15)
* zodbot (9)
* akshayvyas (9)
* FranciscoD (3)
* jreznik_ (3)
* satellit (2)
* Black74hat (2)
* stephen_pollei (1)
* kparal (1)
* Embolalia (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot