2008/3/27, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg(a)hi.is>:
Antonio M wrote:
> 2008/3/27, Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:53 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> > I have a mixed network with Windows XP, F8 and F9 (rawhide)
>> > I am sharing an HP Laserprinter (that is attached to the XP machine)
>> > and I can print from F8 computer, but I can't from F9.
>> > Setup is similar. Printer is detected from config-system-printer on
>> > both F8 and F9 but when I print a test page from F9 nothing happens.
>> > I gave a look to log files for cups but I didn't see anything
strange!!!
>> > Where shall I start to look from scratch????
>> > Cups is v.1.3.6 on both Fedora machines.
>>
>>
>> Try using the troubleshooter: from system-config-printer, select
>> Help->Troubleshoot. It probably won't be able to find your problem
>> specifically, but will most likely have some useful information that you
>> will be able to paste into a bug report.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim.
>> */
>>
>>
>> --
>> fedora-test-list mailing list
>> fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>> To unsubscribe:
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>>
>>
>>
> Filed as:
> Bug 439154: Cannot print on a Windows shared printer
>
Just tested setting up 2 printers through S-C-P
( HP Laserjet 9000 and HP color Laserjet 4600 )
with "windows" authentication against AD
The network printers are sett up on cups printer server (
cups-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.4 )
running on RHEL 5
Worked flawlessly :)
Which show the smb authentication faze is working.. ( at least against
2003 AD )
Maybe the printer job is getting dropped on the xp end?
Sure you don't have "allow" FC9 beta machine to print on the XP machine
( share/firewall/antivirus on xp ??? )
Best regards
Johann B.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Johann
1) I am testing F9, no problem with F8 and same cups, and also with
first release of F9.Unfortunately I made updates in the meantime but i
didn't print much since then...
2) There is no firewall on the XP machine
3) I guess that something is wrong with samba (but it is a shot in the
dark, no idea where to begin...)
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag