On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 05/31/2009 04:32 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > um ... given your wording, can i assume that f11 is the first
> > fedora where this package has been broken out? which would
> > explain why this builds just fine under f10 for others?
> >
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Correct.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> that appears to have fixed it. yee ha! buckets of thanks. i
> can now update the wiki page to cover f11.
Hello,
I think I will add "glibc-static" into FEL's section on the comps.xml.
Hence it will reduce pain for embedded designers.
i'm not convinced that's a good idea. there's no point polluting
the group sections with packages that might not be necessary. i think
it will be sufficient for tools like openembedded to generate their
own warnings. this isn't a fedora problem, let's not make it one.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page:
http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================