On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Antonio M
<antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/1/29 Antonio M <antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com>:
>> 2009/1/29 Jerry Amundson <jamundso(a)gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Antonio M
<antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have two F11 systems with similar packages.
>>>> On both I have
>>>> fedora-release 10.91-1 Fedora release files
>>>> fedora-release-notes 10.0.0-1 Release Notes for Fedora
10
>>>> livna-release 1-1
rpm.livna.org
repository files
>>>> rpmfusion-free-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion (free)
Repository Configuration
>>>> rpmfusion-nonfree-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion
(nonfree) Repository
>>>> Configuration
>>>>
>>>> but Webmin reports one as:
>>>> Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.90
>>>> and the other as:
>>>> Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.91
>>>>
>>>> Why???
>>>
>>> Do both report 10.91 at boot? (the progress text bar or graphic spinny
thing)
>>>
>>> If so, then the webmin list is two doors down, on the left...
>>>
>>> jerry
>>>
>>
>> jerry
>>
>> I forgot to check the progress bar, that reports 10.90 on one system.Why??
>> I re-checked this morning and I have fedora-release-10.91-1.noarch installed.
>> Funny....
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Montagnani
>> Skype : antoniomontag
>>
>
> I cheched fedora-release in etc and it says: Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide)
> Shall I file a bug???
>
Did you possibly install these packages in a different order on these systems?
Perhaps check the install/update times in /var/log/yum.log .... ?
Were they installed in different order (that is, 10.90 after 10.91-1)?
tom
--
Tom London
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
I think that install 10.90 after 10.91 is not possible, unless
particular options.
Anyway, fedora-release in /etc reports
Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide)
So what is wrong???
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag