On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:35:34AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski
<D.Mierzejewski(a)icm.edu.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:11:10PM +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Compose started at Tue Oct 27 06:15:09 UTC 2009
>>
>> Broken deps for i386
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
>> blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
>> orsa-lam-0.7.0-11.fc12.i686 requires lam
>> scalapack-lam-1.7.5-7.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
>> scalapack-lam-1.7.5-7.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
>> tachyon-lam-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
>> tachyon-lam-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
>> tachyon-lam-gl-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
>> tachyon-lam-gl-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
>
>> Removed package lam
>
> Huh what? WTH are you thinking removing a package when we're in Beta
> freeze?
Here's the tickets that discussed the removal:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2712
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523998
lam should probably be added back until the dependent programs can be
migrated to use OpenMPI.
I notice that there isn't a word there about who will be responsible for
fixing the packages which depend on LAM currently. You can't just remove
a package without some sort of early warning and a plan to fix the
fall-out.
Regards,
R.
--
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann*at*icm.edu.pl> | LAN Staff
Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling
University of Warsaw |
http://www.icm.edu.pl | tel. +48 22 5540810