On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> So, why is kdemultimedia i386 installed?
This just gets better...
[root@spirit ~]# rpm -e kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.i386
So far so good. No complaints from rpm and the disk drive made noise. Now, I
wonder if it left the 64 bit apps alone?
[root@spirit ~]# rpm -qV kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.x86_64
.......T /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/kde-multimedia-music.menu
.......T /usr/share/apps/noatun/magictable
missing /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/apis.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/arts-structure.png
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/artsbuilder.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/common
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/detail.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/digitalaudio.docbook
missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/faq.docbook
Nope. It ate the files from both packages.
Ah, these happen to be the same but most likely are accounted for
only in one package to avoid "conflicts". You removed their "owner"
and they are gone. No, I do not know that for sure ...
BTW - if you are using yum to maintain your system you will be
likely safer with
yum remove kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.i386
or just
yum remove kdemultimedia.i386
Not that much difference really here but at least you will have
traces in /var/log/yum.log and possible dependency chains will
be handled for you.
Michal