On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 23:45 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Is there any chance of running that at, say,
> >
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a
> > local instance?
>
> I mean, in *theory* we could for sure, it's just yet another
> maintenance task for someone, and I'm not jumping up to volunteer for
> it right now...if we could script the update of the instances a bit
> more (right now one of us has to go into the admin UI and update it
> manually every milestone), maybe I'd be more inclined :P
Is the maintenance headache in installing and running/updating the
service, or is it in this milestone updating? If it's the latter, we
could probably ask Jan to handle it as part of FPgM duties. Would that
help? (Probably for both the "nextrelease" *and* current app.)
Well kinda both, though adding a second server doesn't add a *huge*
maintenance burden (just a minor annoyance). Rather than just farming
the work off onto someone else, though, it'd be more efficient for
someone (anyone...) to take a bit of time to automate the milestone and
release updates, it shouldn't be *too* crazily difficult to do (though
we'd need to find some kind of way to identify when a milestone release
happens, I guess).
To be clear, if this isn't just an idle thought but a specific request
that "yes, blockerbugs-nextrelease would be an extremely useful thing
for me, please do it", we probably *can* do that. If that's the case,
please file a ticket in fedora-qa pagure and we'll likely get to it.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net