On 09/08/2011 02:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that
the
Beta virt criterion:
"The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
where the virtual host is running the same release (using Fedora's
current preferred virtualization technology)"
doesn't really imply that virtual host functionality must work; only
that _if_ virtual host functionality is working, then virtual guest
functionality must work. This was not really our intent with the
criterion, we intended to require both to work at Beta stage. So here's
a proposed improvement:
"The release must be able to self-host using Fedora's current preferred
virtualization technology: that is, the release must be able to act as a
virtual host, and must also successfully install and boot as a virtual
guest when running on a host which is also running the release"
I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer.
Any better ideas?
Suggestions:
A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
Fedora release.
I think the last part of the original sentence is redundant.
However, I'd prefer:
A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
Fedora release as well as all previous Fedora releases.
"Current preferred virtualization technology:"
Is too ambiguous, lets call a spade a space and state KVM if that
statement is required.
Albert