On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 11:53 -0500, pmkellly(a)frontier.com wrote:
In retrospect my initial thinking on this test case was erroneous.
Most
of my carrer was spent making sure the documents I wrote were as
comprehensive as possible and left little to doubt. I'm getting used
to
how test cases and other documents are done here. I see the
advantages
of having variation in how the tests are run. I will stop work on
this
case and take this experience into account in how I look at others.
That's exactly right :) Things can be a little different here indeed,
just because of the practicalities of how much we have to test, how
fast things change, and how few people we have to do it with...so we
sometimes need this kind of intentionally-vague test case.
We *do* have the very-specific-these-are-exactly-the-steps-to-do type
of test case in some situations as well, of course. It all depends on
the circumstances.
Thanks for continuing to contribute and taking the feedback! It's
really great, please do keep suggesting things :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net